My complaint about Chuck March 21, 2007
Foolishness , trackbackEheh. Heh. I thought this was funny. I stumbled across an interesting website that generates complaints. All I did was put “Chuck” in the the “first name” field and whaddya know? There’s actually some very insightful stuff in here. Blows yer mind!
My inquiries, necessarily hasty and perfunctory as I write this letter to meet a deadline, have elicited a wealth of information about Chuck. I want to share this with you because Chuck’s more than foolish. She’s mega-foolish. In fact, to understand just how foolish Chuck is, you first need to realize that I frequently wish to tell her that you don’t know how tempted I am to slap the stuffing out of her. But being a generally genteel person, however, I always bite my tongue. When I hear her say that her activities are on the up-and-up, I have to wonder about her. Is she thoroughly wanton? Is she simply being morally crippled? Or is she merely embracing a delusion in which she must believe in order to continue believing in herself? I once asked Chuck that question — I am still waiting for an answer. Well, I refuse to get caught up in Chuck’s “I think … I believe … I feel” game. Okay, I admit that most people are loath to admit that appeasement is not the answer. But if, five years ago, I had described a person like Chuck to you and told you that in five years, she’d tear down everything that can possibly be regarded as a support of cultural elevation, you’d have thought me choleric. You’d have laughed at me and told me it couldn’t happen. That said, let me continue. To end this letter, I would like to make a bet with Chuck. I will gladly give her a day’s salary if she can prove that it’s inappropriate to teach children right from wrong, as she insists. If Chuck is unable to prove that, then her end of the bargain is to step aside while I foster mutual understanding. So, do we have a bet, Chuck?
Comments»
Heh - such a friend indeed. How’d they know I was foolish?
Here’s the one I got on you.
I may be risking my life by telling you this, but Julia’s expostulations are a parody of original thought. For practical reasons, I have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which I have something new to say. The natural result of Julia’s metanarratives is an intolerance that, in the long run, tends to tell us how to live, what to say, what to think, what to know, and — most importantly — what not to know. It is unclear whether this is because Julia is just making a mug of herself when she says that censorship could benefit us, because she can’t see beyond her own crafty concerns, or a combination of the two. It is sad to see her bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive. Equally important is the fact that she has a strategy. Her strategy is to level filth and slime at everyone opposed to her hijinks. Wherever you encounter that strategy, you are dealing with Julia.
Even Julia’s underlings are afraid that Julia will perpetuate harmful stereotypes any day now. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again, and it is further evidence that Julia keeps telling everyone within earshot that her sentiments won’t be used for political retribution. I’m guessing that Julia read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More reliable sources generally indicate that every so often, you’ll see her lament, flog herself, cry mea culpa for seeking to start wars, ruin the environment, invent diseases, and routinely do a hundred other things that kill people, and vow never again to be so cranky. Sadly, she always reverts to her old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that if you think that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin, then you’re suffering from very serious nearsightedness. You’re focusing too much on what Julia wants you to see and failing to observe many other things of much greater importance, such as that she takes things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide decent referencing so the reader can check up on her. Julia also ignores all of the evidence that doesn’t support (or in many cases directly contradicts) her position. Julia just keeps on saying, “I don’t give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to usher in the rule of the Antichrist and the apocalyptic end times.” To recap the main points made in this letter: 1) Julia is perfectly willing to show her embarrassingly poor reasoning and warped ethics in print, 2) she should take a step back and look at everything from a different perspective, and 3) her contrivances run contrary to even the most cursory observation of the real world.
Ouch. I don’t even understand it all (where’s Kenji when you need him?) but it just sounds MEAN, Chuck. Gosh, all I accused you of was mega-foolishness and you’re saying I want to usher in the rule of the Antichrist…..ouch.
heh - I knew you’d appreciate it. Heck I”M trying to usher in the rule of the Antichrist. The sooner he gets in, the sooner he gets kicked out.
Know what I mean?
kapowie!
“I’m guessing that Julia read that on some Web site of dubious validity”
So…exactly HOW much time do you spend on The Hollow Blah?
heh heh.
Gosh I’m just joking. I only make fun of things I have to study with a dictionary and the latest edition of World Encyclopedia.